tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294135473370786875.post6854269531693217111..comments2014-07-17T18:57:29.528-04:00Comments on Project Potpourri: Invention Idea #1DUhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15427884103652875815noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294135473370786875.post-46991861329650746132008-11-20T23:43:00.000-05:002008-11-20T23:43:00.000-05:00There could be other benefits, like detecting subm...There could be other benefits, like detecting submarines in the classroom.Karlhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04047429486903657925noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294135473370786875.post-92163401209125046902008-11-20T08:56:00.000-05:002008-11-20T08:56:00.000-05:00I am not (yet) a certified ultrasoniceer, but I ca...I am not (yet) a certified ultrasoniceer, but I can think of 3 possible differences:<BR/><BR/>1) Frequency<BR/><BR/>2) Especially if coupled with the size of the object (probably the frequency should be near the natural resonance of the organism?)<BR/><BR/>3) Power. I'm thinking of a truly unholy blast of ultrasound that would be deafening if you could hear it. I bet medical ultrasounds are pretty low volume because sound transmission in water is good.<BR/><BR/>Hey, I wonder if bats could or do clean themselves ultrasonically. Also, this technology should be made bat-friendly.DUhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15427884103652875815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7294135473370786875.post-52812281950354021412008-11-20T08:51:00.000-05:002008-11-20T08:51:00.000-05:00Well, wait. Ultrasound blasts all living organism...Well, wait. Ultrasound blasts all living organisms? Because that's not what I remember happening at my ultrasounds.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com